Main Article Content
molecular cuisine, sensory quality, consumer preference, food attitude, innovative technique
The aim of the study was to explore consumers’ attitude toward molecular cuisine, specifically the sensory evaluation of these dishes. The experiment was performed in a laboratory among 10 panelists and 150 consumers to compare a sensory profile of molecular courses to their traditional versions.
Sensory profile of traditional dishes had a significantly higher, or comparable intensity in sensory attributes than molecular version and was preferred by consumers (p<_0.05). The results indicate positive attitude of consumers to modernist dishes and their moderately high sensory-experience ratings. Most of them showed willingness to try other molecular dishes in the future.
Chen Q., Anders S., and An H. 2013. Measuring consumer resistance to a new food technology: a choice experiment in meat packaging. Food Qual. Pref. 28(2):419-428.
Civille G.V. and Carr B.T. 2015. ‘Sensory evaluation techniques’. 5rd. ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 29-42.
de Graaf C,. Cardello A.V., Kramer F.M., Lesher L.L., Meiselman H.L. and Schutz H.G. 2005. A comparison between liking ratings obtained under laboratory and field conditions: The role of choice. Appetite 44(1):15-22.
Den Uijl L.C., Jager G., De Graaf C., Waddell J., and Kremer S. 2014. It is not just a meal, it is an emotional experience –a segmentation of older persons based on the emotions that they associate with mealtimes. Appetite 83:287-296.
Favalli S., Skov T., and Byrne D.V. 2013. Sensory perception and understanding of food uniqueness: From the traditional to the novel. Food Res. Int. 50(1):176-188.
Fernqvist F. and Ekelund L. 2014. Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food –A review. Food Qual. Prefer. 32:340-353.
Fraat F. and Zainal A. 2016. The Influence of Hedonic Characteristics on Chefs’ Acceptance Towards Molecular Asam Pedas. In Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2014), pp. 1085-1094. Springer, Singapore.
Guiné R.P., Dias A., Peixoto A., Matos M., Gonzaga M. and Silva M. (2012). Application of molecular gastronomy principles to the development of a powdered olive oil and market study aiming at its commercialization. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci.1(2):101-106.
Holthuysen N., Vrijhof M.N., de Wijk R.A. and Kremer S. 2017. Welcome on board: Overall liking and just-about-right ratings of airplane meals in three different consumption contexts-laboratory, re_created airplane, and actual airplane. J. Sens. Stud. 32(2). DOI: doi.org/10.1111/joss.12254.
Ivanovic S., Mikinac K. and Perman L. 2011. Molecular gastronomy in function of scientific implementation in practice. J. Economics 2:139-150.
King S.C., Meiselman H.L. and Henriques A. 2008. The effect of choice and psychographics on the acceptability of novel flavors. Food Qual. Prefer.19(8):692-696.
Lee P. and Rogers M.A. 2012. Effect of calcium source and exposure time on basic caviar spherification using sodium alginate Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 1:96-100.
M?rkut L., M?rkut A. and Mârza B. 2014. Modern Tendencies in Changing the Consumers’ Preference. Procedia Econ. Financ. 16:535-539.
Michel C., Velasco C., Fraemohs P. and Spence Ch. 2015. Studying the impact of plating and cutlery on ratings of the food served in naturalistic dining contexts. Appetite 90:45-50.
Mielby L.H. and Frost MB. 2010. Expectations and surprise in a molecular gastronomic meal. Food Qual. Prefer. 21:213-224.
Olabi A., Neuhaus Th., Bustos R., Cook-Camacho M., Corvi T. and Abdouni L. 2015. An investigation of flavor complexity and food neophobia. Food Qual. Prefer. 42:123-129.
PN-EN ISO 5495: 2007. Polish Standard. Sensory analysis. Methodology. Paired comparison test.
PN-EN ISO 8586:2014-03. Polish Standard. Sensory analysis. General guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected assessors and expert sensory assessors.
PN-ISO 13299:2003. Polish Standard. Sensory analysis. Methodology. General guidelines for determining the sensory profile.
PN-ISO 4121:1998. Polish Standard. Sensory analysis. Methodology. Evaluation of Food Products by Methods Using Scales.
Premavalli K.S., Wadikar D.D. and Nanjappa C. 2009. Comparison of the acceptability ratings of appetizers under laboratory, base level and high altitude field conditions. Appetite 53(1):127-130.
Siegrist M. 2008. Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. Trends Food Sci. Technol.19(11):603-608.
This H. 2013a. Solutions are Solutions, and gels are almost solutions. Pure Appl. Chem. 85, 1:257-276.
This H. 2013 b. Molecular gastronomy is a scientific discipline, and note by note cuisine is the next culinary trend. Flavour 2:1.
Traynor M.P., Burke R., O'Sullivan M.G., Hannon J.A. and Barry-Ryan C. 2013. Sensory and chemical interactions of food pairings (basmati rice, bacon and extra virgin olive oil) with banana. Food Res. Int. 54(1):569-577.
Tuorila H. 2007. ‘Sensory perception as a basis of food acceptance and consumption. Consumer-led food product development’. pp. 34-65, Woodhead Publishing.
Tüzünkan D. and Albayrak A. 2015. Research About Molecular Cuisine Application As An Innovation Example In Instambul Restaurants. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 195:446-452.
Van Trijp H.C.M. and van Kleef E. 2008. Newness, value and new product performance. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19:562-573.
Verbeke W. 2006. Functional foods. Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health. Food Qual. Prefer. 17(1-2):126-131.
Vega C. and Castells P. 2012. ‘Spherification -Faux Caviar and skinless Ravioli’.In ‘The kitchen reflections on the science of food and cooking’. C. Vega, J. Ubbink and E. Linden (Ed.), pp. 25-32, Columbia University Press. New York.
Yek G.S. and Struwe K. 2008. Deconstructing Molecular gastronomy. Food Technol. 62:34-45.
Yeomans M.R., Chambers L., Blumenthal H. and Blake A. 2008. The role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation: The case of smoked salmon ice -cream. Food Qual. Prefer.19:565-573.
Youseff J., Juravle G., Youssef L., Woods A. and Spence Ch. 2015. Aesthetic plating: a preference for oblique lines ascending to the right. Flavour 4:27.