Download

Original Article

Evaluation of heavy metal accumulation and associated human health risks in three commercial marine fish species from the Aegean Sea, Türkiye

Engin Artar*, Mine Percin Olgunoglu, Ilkan Ali Olgunoglu

Kahta Vocational Training School, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Türkiye

Abstract

This study investigates the presence and concentrations of ten specific heavy metals in the muscle tissues and gonads of three commercially important marine fish species: Garfish (Belone belone), European barracuda (Sphyraena sphyraena), and Anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) collected from the Aegean Sea in Türkiye. The results indicate variations in metal accumulation, both between genders and among species. The fish species tend to accumulate higher levels of heavy metals in their gonads than in muscle tissues (p<0.05). While Cr, Cd, and Pb were not detected, Zn, Cu, and Fe are the predominant metals in muscle tissues due to their essential biological roles. However, within toxic elements, Hg was predominant, and L. piscatorius, a benthic fish, exceeded its recommended safety limits. A health risk assessment suggests that except for L. piscatorius, consuming these fish species from the Aegean Sea is generally safe, with estimated weekly intake (EWI) values below permissible limits. Total Hazard Quotient (THQ) values for most metals are below 1, indicating no significant non-carcinogenic health risks for consumers. This study emphasizes the critical need for regularly monitoring heavy metal levels in marine fish from the Aegean Sea, Turkiye. While overall safety in consuming these fish is highlighted, exceptions exist, notably concerning Hg levels in L. piscatorius. Therefore, persistent monitoring of heavy metal concentrations, especially in L. piscatorius, is advised to ensure ongoing safety and mitigate potential risks of metal accumulation.

Key words: Aegean Sea, gonad, heavy metal, human health, marine fish, muscle tissue

*Corresponding Author: Engin Artar, Kahta Vocational Training School, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Türkiye. Email: [email protected]

Received: 11 October 2023; Accepted: 21 April 2024; Published: 8 May 2024

DOI: 10.15586/ijfs.v36i2.2474

© 2024 Codon Publications
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Introduction

In the last several decades, heavy metal pollution in water bodies (in aquatic systems) has been a significant and growing concern in many fast-growing cities worldwide. This is because heavy metals, when present in excessive amounts in the environment, can pose significant threats to water supplies and human health by consuming fish and other aquatic organisms (Akoto et al., 2014). This problem results from various human activities and industrial processes that release heavy metals into the environment. As aquatic inhabitants, fish are highly susceptible to the harmful effects of heavy metals in aquatic environments. Because marine organisms can accumulate these contaminants from various environmental sources, including water, food, bottom sediment, and suspended particles in the water column (Ayas et al., 2007; Bat et al., 2020). However, many aquatic organisms can accumulate metals in concentrations much higher than those in the surrounding water or sediment (Usman and Mustapha, 2017). Heavy metals such as Mercury (Hg), Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), and Arsenic (As) tend to accumulate in the muscle tissues and gonads of aquatic organisms, and they are generally not biodegradable, and they have long biological half-lives (Olgunoglu et al., 2015). The bioaccumulation of heavy metals in seafood can pose significant health risks to humans and other consumers when they consume contaminated seafood (Han et al., 2021).

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), managing the presence of heavy metals in food sources is crucial to ensure public safety (Olgunoglu et al., 2015; Olgunoglu, 2015). Hence, we must be sure that fish and seafood are not contaminated with heavy metals and do not exceed their acceptance limits is crucial for both human health and environmental sustainability (Sabbir et al., 2018). Several marine fish species serve as bioindicators to assess the quality of aquatic environments because they can accumulate significant amounts of certain metals in their various tissues (Farombi et al., 2007; Safahieh et al., 2011). Therefore, utilization of several fish species as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution in environmental monitoring studies has been widely recognized and emphasized in recent years by numerous investigators and researchers (Chen-Yi et al., 2001; Yılmaz, 2003; Dural et al., 2007; Yılmaz et al., 2007; Uysal et al., 2008; El-Moselhy et al., 2014; Khezri et al., 2014; Külcü et al., 2014; Oguz and Yeltekin, 2014; Gu et al., 2017; Anser and Benamal, 2018; Astani et al., 2018).

In the study, for the assessment of metal accumulation in fish, edible muscle tissue and gonads were chosen as the main organs since the metal content in muscle tissue indicates the prevailing metal levels in the surrounding waters. In contrast, the accumulation of metals in the gonads sheds light on the long-term retention of these elements within the fish (Ateş et al.,2015). Therefore, the main goal of this study is to investigate the presence and concentrations of ten metals including Aluminum (Al), Copper (Cu), Iron (Fe), Nickel (Ni), Chromium (Cr), Zinc (Zn), Manganese (Mn), Mercury (Hg), Cadmium (Cd), and Lead (Pb), in the muscle tissues and gonads of three fish species collected from the Aegean Sea in Türkiye. We assessed the heavy metal content in the muscle tissue of various fish species, which are important protein sources for human life, and examined its potential impact on public health.

Material and Methods

Collection and preparation of raw materials

The marine fish species examined in this research, which inhabit various parts of the water column and possess distinct dietary habits, were collected from the Aegean Sea in Türkiye in February 2023 (Figure 1). The Aegean Sea is situated between the western and southwestern shores of Türkiye and the eastern shores of Greece. It is an elongated embayment of the Mediterranean Sea, home to a series of islands known as the Aegean Islands (Makedonski et al., 2015).

Figure 1. Sampling area. (38°55´38.95´´ N-26°6´39.69´´ E / 38°44´56.80´´N-26°21´48.54´´E).

The collected samples were immediately washed with clean seawater at the collection point to remove any external contaminants. To maintain the freshness of the samples and prevent spoilage during transportation to the laboratory, cleaned samples were placed in a container and preserved in crushed ice. In the laboratory, the samples were subject to measurements, which included determining the total size, weight, and gender of the fish. Based on the gender determination, various components, including edible tissues and gonads, were separated. After measurements and separation, the samples were placed in labeled polyethylene bags and stored at a temperature of -20ºC until they were processed for metal analysis. Fifteen specimens were collected from each fish species in the sampling area.

Determination of heavy metals

The muscle tissue and gonad samples were transported to the Accredited Industrial Services Laboratory of Türkiye in Izmir using dry ice to ensure low temperatures and preserve the sample integrity during transportation. For each fish species, 2 grams of edible muscle tissue and gonad samples were weighed and placed in a digestion vessel. To prepare the samples for analysis, 5 ml of concentrated (65%) nitric acid (HNO3) and 2 ml of (30%) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were added to the vessel. The samples were digested in a microwave oven (NMKL, 1998). The determination of heavy metals was carried out using Inductively Coupled Plasma–Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES-Perkin Elmer Optima 8000º) instrument. The metal concentration results were expressed in micrograms per gram (μg/g) of wet weight.

Assessment of health risk

The equation associated with public health risks is presented as follows:

Equation (1): Estimated daily intake (EDI) of heavy metals (Sadeghi et al., 2020):

EDI=MC×FDCBW

MC (μg/g) is the concentration of heavy metals in the fish muscle; FDC is the average food daily consumption of fish muscle (g/person/day), which is 17.81g/person/day in Türkiye (Yalçın ve Çakmak, 2023) and BW is the body weight (average 70 kg for adults). EDI was expressed as μg/kg bw/day (Sadeghi et al., 2020):

Equation (2): Estimated weekly intake (EWI) of heavy metals (Alipour et al., 2015):

EWI = EDI×7 days

Equation (3): Target hazard quotients (THQ) (Sadeghi et al., 2020):

THQ=EF×ED×FIR×CRfDs×BW×ATn×103

Table 1 provides the factors, units, and values in the target hazard quotients (THQ) formula.

Table 1. Parameters and values used in THQ analysis (Javed and Usmani, 2016; Sadeghi et al., 2020; Çiftçi et al., 2021; Pokorska et al., 2022; Tecimen et al., 2023).

Factor Statement Unit Value
EF Exposure frequency Days per year 365
ED Exposure duration Years 70
FIR Food ingestion rate g/person/day 17.81
C Metal concentration µg/g Present study
BW Body weight kg 70
ATn Average exposure time for non-carcinogen effects days per year × ED (365*70) 25550
RfDs Oral reference dose mg/kg/day Pb=0.0035; Ni=0.02; Cd=0.001; Al=1; Cr=0.003; Cu=0.04; Fe=0.7; Mn=0.14; Zn=0.3; Hg=0.0001

Equation (4): Total Target Hazard Quotient (∑THQ) (Pokorska et al., 2022):

∑THQ = THQ(Zn) + THQ(Mn) + • • • THQ(Hg)

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS 21.0 for Windows. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Independent Samples t Test, and Post hoc test (Duncan) were employed to compare group means, with a significance level set at 0.05. The reported mean values represent the results of three experiments and are presented as X±SD.

Results and Discussion

Metal concentrations in the fish muscle and gonads

Table 2 shows the mean weights (g) and total length of female and male fish species obtained from the Aegean Sea in Türkiye.

Table 2. The mean weights (g) and total length of female and male fish species (mean±SD).

Species Average Total Length (cm) Weight (g) Habitat Feeding habits
B. belone 33.06± 2.63a 42.86±6.52a Pelagic Carnivorous
32.53±1.94a 39.46±6.87a
S. sphyraena 41.05± 2.01a 253.77± 10.85a Pelagic Carnivorous
35.50±1.00a 200.53±5.96a
L. piscatorius 62.66± 2.51a 2418± 105.15a Benthic Carnivorous
39.23±3.60b 766.67±87.36b

♀: Female; ♂: Male. Significant statistical differences are indicated by distinct letters (a, b) within the same column (p<0.05).

The total length and weight differences between female and male L. piscatorius were statistically significant (p <0.05). Conversely, no noticeable variations in total length and weight were identified between males and females of B. belone and S. sphyraena (p>0.05).

The elements were categorized into two groups based on their significance in biological systems and their potential roles in environmental pollution. The first group, which includes Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, and Cr, consists of essential elements required for various biological functions in organisms and naturally present in animal tissues, playing vital roles in maintaining health. The second group, Al, Ni, Hg, Cd, and Pb, consists of non-essential elements that can have toxic effects on living organisms (Makedonski et al., 2015). The data provided in the present study is presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Concentrations of heavy metals in muscle tissue and gonad of B. belone, S. sphyraena, and L. piscatorius (µg g–1 wet weight).

Metals B. belone S. sphyraena L. piscatorius
Muscle Gonad Muscle Gonad Muscle Gonad
Essential elements
Cu 0.346±0.040♀
0.454±0.052*♂
1.288±0.148*♀
1.238±0.142♂
0.309±0.036*♀
0.263±0.030♂
1.040±0.120*♀
0.915±0.105♂
0.158±0.018♀
0.181±0.021*♂
2.073±0.353*♀
1.840±0.212♂
Zn 7.071±0.768♀
9.731±1.057*♂
34.71±3.77*♀
16.85±1.83♂
3.297±0.358♀
3.702±0.402*♂
36.873±0.746*♀
25.77±10.40♂
3.999±0.434♀
7.958±0.864*♂
11.75±1.28♀
13.73±1.49*♂
Fe 2.354±0.248♀
5.044±0.531*♂
79.01±8.31*♀
48.25±5.08♂
1.13±0.090♀
1.936±0.204*♂
23.356±0.353*♀
17.54±2.90♂
1.025±0.250♀
1.244±0.131*♂
7.447±0.783♀
13.40±3.51*♂
Mn nd♀
nd♂
1.568±0.339*♀
1.138±0.149♂
nd♀
nd♂
0.351±0.046♀
0.544±0.071*♂
0.182±0.024*♀
0.106±0.014♂
0.368±0.048♀
0.470±0.061*♂
Cr nd♀
nd♂
0.232±0.030*♀
0.156±0.020♂
nd♀
nd♂
nd♀
nd♂
nd♀
nd♂
nd♀
nd♂
Non-essential (Toxic) elements
Al 0.287±0.029*♀
nd♂
2.248±0.229*♀
nd♂
nd♀
nd♂
0.310±0.032♀
0.542±0.059*♂
nd♀
nd♂
1.132±0.115*♀
0.753±0.077♂
Ni 0.126±0.019♀
0.138±0.021*♂
0.183±0.028♀
0.236±0.036*♂
nd♀
nd♂
0.236±0.036*♀
0.111±0.017♂
nd♀
0.147±0.022*♂
0.105±0.016♀
0.289±0.044*♂
Hg 0.025±0.005*♀
0.024±0.005♂
0.048±0.010*♀
0.034±0.007♂
0.069±0.014♀
0.088±0.018*♂
0.486±0.09*♀
0.417±0.085♂
1.109±0.225*♀
0.211±0.043♂
1.398±0.283*♀
0.290±0.059♂
Cd nd♀
nd♂
0.045±0.009*♀
0.037±0.007♂
nd♀
nd♂
nd♀
nd♂
nd♀
nd 1♂
0.087±0.018*♀
0.076±0.013♂
Pb nd♀ nd♂ 0.058±0.011*♀
0.026±0.005♂
nd♀ nd♂ nd♀ nd♂ nd♀ nd♀ 0.011±0.002*♀
0.010±0.002♂

♀: Female; ♂: Male; nd: below detection limit; limits of detection of measurements are Al<0.250; Mn<0.1; Cr<0.1; Ni<0.1; Cd<0.01; Pb<0.01; * indicates the higher one; The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate measurements.

As shown in Table 3, for B. belone, the levels of Cu were significantly higher in the gonads of both female (♀) and male (♂) fish, with values of 1.288±0.148 µg/g and 1.238±0.142 µg/g, respectively, compared to the muscle tissue where Cu concentrations were lower at 0.346±0.040 µg/g for females and 0.454±0.052 µg/g for males (p<0.05). Similar patterns were observed for Zn, which were significantly higher in the gonads (34.71±3.77 µg/g for females and 16.85±1.83 µg/g for males) than the muscle (7.071±0.768 µg/g for females and 9.731±1.057 µg/g for males) (p<0.05). Fe concentrations also exhibited the same trend, with significantly higher levels in the gonads (79.01±8.31 µg/g for females and 48.25±5.08 µg/g for males) compared to the muscle tissue (2.354±0.248 µg/g for females and 5.044±0.531 µg/g for males) (p<0.05). Mn concentrations were below the detection limit in the muscle tissue for both females and males but were detectable in the gonads, with values of 1.568±0.339 µg/g for females and 1.138±0.149 µg/g for males (p<0.05). Cr was also below the detection limit in the muscle tissue for both genders but was present in the gonads, with values of 0.232±0.030 µg/g for females and 0.156±0.020 µg/g for males (p<0.05). Al was detected in the muscle tissue of females at a concentration of 0.287±0.029 µg/g, while it was below the detection limit in males. Al exhibited higher levels in the gonads of females, measuring 2.248±0.229 µg/g, whereas the levels were below the detection limit (<0.250 µg/g) in male gonads. Notably, while the differences in Al concentrations between gonads and muscle tissue were not statistically significant (p>0.05), they were found to be statistically significant between the genders (p<0.05). Ni concentrations in gonads were significantly higher than in muscle for both genders, with values of 0.183±0.028 µg/g for females and 0.236±0.036 µg/g for males (p<0.05). Hg levels were lower in the muscle than in the gonads for both genders. Importantly, these differences in Hg concentrations between gonads and muscle tissue were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Cd and Pb concentrations were below the detection limit in the muscle tissue for both females and males. However, they were detectable in the gonads, with Cd concentrations of 0.45±0.009 µg/g for females, 0.037±0.007 µg/g for males, and Pb concentrations of 0.058±0.011 µg/g for females and 0.026±0.005 µg/g for males. The differences in Cd and Pb concentrations between the gonads and muscle tissue were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05)

In the muscle tissue of both genders, the level of Zn was higher than other metal concentrations. The order of mean metal concentrations in the muscle of B. belone was as follows.

In females, Zn> Fe> Cu> Al> Ni> Hg

In males, Zn> Fe> Cu> Ni> Hg

Within the gonads, Fe exhibited the highest concentration, followed by others, with the order being Fe> Zn> Al>Mn> Cu> Cr>Ni>Pb> Hg> Cd for females.

In males, the order of concentration in gonadal tissues was Fe> Zn> Cu >Mn>Ni>Cr> Cd>Hg>Pb.

Except for Al, the variation in heavy metal concentrations between genders was not found to be statistically significant (p>0.05).

For S. sphyraena, Cu concentrations were found to be significantly higher in female gonads (1.040±0.120 µg/g) and male gonads (0.915±0.105 µg/g) compared to muscle tissues, where Cu concentrations were lower in females (0.309±0.036 µg/g) and males (0.263±0.030 µg/g) (p<0.05). Similarly, Zn concentrations were higher in female gonads (36.873±0.746 µg/g) and male gonads (25.77±10.40 µg/g) compared to muscle tissues (p<0.05). Fe concentrations also exhibited a similar trend, with significantly higher levels in female gonads (23.356±0.353 µg/g) and male gonads (17.54±2.90 µg/g) compared to muscle tissues (p<0.05). Mn concentrations were below the detection limit in the muscle tissues for both females and males, while they were detectable in the gonads, with values of 0.351±0.046 µg/g for females and 0.544±0.071 µg/g for males (p<0.05). Al was also below the detection limit in the muscle tissues for both sexes, while they were detectable in the gonads with values of 0.310±0.032 µg/g for females and 0.542±0.059 µg/g for males (p<0.05). In the gonads, Ni levels were higher than in muscle tissue (p<0.05). Hg levels were lower in the muscle tissues than in the gonads for both genders (p<0.05), with Hg concentrations of 0.088±0.018 µg/g for males and 0.069±0.014 µg/g for females in muscle tissues and 0.486±0.09 µg/g for females and 0.417±0.085 µg/g for males in gonads. Cr, Cd, and Pb concentrations were below the detection limit in the muscle tissues and gonads for both females and males.

The order of concentration in muscle tissues for females was Zn> Fe> Cu>Hg

For males, the order of concentration in muscle tissues is as follows: Zn> Fe> Cu> Hg

In females, the order of concentration in gonads from highest to lowest is as follows: Zn> Fe> Cu>Hg>Mn>Al> Ni

In males, Zn> Fe >Cu> Mn> Al> Hg> Ni

The variation in heavy metal concentrations between genders was not found to be statistically significant (p>0.05).

For L. piscatorius, Cu concentrations in the muscle were recorded at 0.158±0.018 µg/g for females and 0.181±0.021 µg/g for males. However, higher Cu concentrations were observed in the gonads, with values of 2.073±0.353 µg/g for females and 1.840±0.212 µg/g for males, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) compared to the muscle tissue. A similar pattern was also observed for Zn (p<0.05). Fe levels in the muscle were 1.025±0.250 µg/g for females and 1.244±0.131 µg/g for males. In contrast, the gonads exhibited higher Fe concentrations, with females at 7.447±0.783 µg/g and males at 13.40±3.51µg/g (p<0.05). Mn concentrations showed a similar pattern, with 0.182±0.024 µg/g in female muscle and 0.106±0.014 µg/g in male muscle, while in the gonads, females had much higher concentration with 0.368±0.048 µg/g of Mn, whereas males had 0.470±0.061 µg/g (p<0.05). Cr concentrations were below the detection limit (<0.1 µg/g) in both muscle and gonads for both genders. Al levels were also below the detection limit (<0.250 µg/g) in the muscle for both females and males. However, in the gonads, females had 1.132±0.115 µg/g of Al, while males had 0.753±0.077 µg/g(p<0.05).

Ni concentrations were below the detection limit (<0.1 µg/g) in female muscle. Ni was found to be 0.147±0.022 µg/g in male muscle. In the gonads, males had higher concentrations, with levels at 0.289±0.044 µg/g, while females had lower concentrations at 0.105±0.016 µg/g. The levels of Hg in the muscle were 1.109±0.225 µg/g for females and 0.211±0.043 µg/g for males. In the gonads, Hg values were found to be higher than muscle, with females at 1.398±0.283 µg/g and males at 0.290±0.059 µg/g. Notably, the differences in Ni and Hg concentrations between the gonads and muscle tissue were insignificant (p>0.05). However, they were statistically significant between the genders (p<0.05). Cd concentrations were below the detection limit (<0.01 µg/g) in muscle tissue for both genders. However, it was observed to be 0.087±0.018 µg/g for females and 0.076±0.013 µg/g for males in the gonads. A similar trend was observed in Pb (p<0.05).

The order of heavy metal levels in the samples was as follows:

In the muscle tissue (Female): Zn>Hg>Fe>Mn>Cu

In the muscle tissue (Males): Zn>Fe>Hg>Cu>Ni>Mn

In gonad (Female): Zn>Fe>Cu>Hg>Al>Mn>Ni> Cd>Pb

In gonad (Male): Zn>Fe>Cu>Al>Mn>Hg>Ni>Cd>Pb

Except for Ni and Hg, the variation in heavy metal concentrations between genders was not found to be statistically significant (p>0.05).

As a result, when comparing all the species examined in this study, it was determined that heavy metal levels in the gonadal tissues were higher than those in the muscle (p<0.05). Gonads are considered target organs for metal accumulation due to their metabolic activity, which can result in the accumulation of metals, sometimes at high levels (Terra et al., 2008). Therefore, this difference was attributed to the physiological activities of the gonads, as muscles are not actively involved in metal accumulation. It has also been reported that the reason for the high metal accumulation in the gonads is that the fish’s defense mechanism regulates metals and pollutants. In this process, some organic and mineral pollutants are transferred from the body to the eggs instead of being eliminated from the body (Astani et al., 2018). Several studies have reported similar findings, indicating that muscle is not an actively involved tissue in accumulating heavy metals (Olgunoglu et al., 2015; Yılmaz, 2013). For instance, in a study, Wong et al., (2001) reported that the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in muscle tissue is lower than in gonads in marine fishes. Astani et al. (2018) reported in their study that the muscle, as the target organ, exhibited the lowest concentration of metals compared to gonads. In another study, it was reported that the concentrations of heavy metals in gonads (both testis and ovary) were higher than in the other organs, as reported by Ebrahimi and Taherianfar (2010). Our findings align with those reported by researchers.

Among the species within toxic elements, Hg was predominant, while Cr, Cd, and Pb were not detected in the muscle tissues. The concentrations in gonads of Fe, Mn, Cr, and Pb in B. belone were found to be statistically more significant (p<0.05). At the same time, Hg in benthic L. piscatorius was also significantly different in muscle and gonads compared to the species examined in the study. It was reported that Hg concentrations in fish can vary depending on the habitat due to habitat-specific differences in the biogeochemical processes related to the cycling and methylation of Hg and variations in the structure of the food web (Smith et al., 2016). Based on a study conducted by Storelli and Marcotrigiano et al. (2000), Lophiidae are positioned at the highest trophic level, leading to the potential for higher body mercury accumulation as a result of mercury biomagnification. It appears that our study’s findings align with the researchers’ interpretations.

It is a fact that heavy metal accumulation can vary among species and is influenced by various factors. Furthermore, it was also observed that, when comparing males and females, heavy metal levels mostly tend to be higher in the muscles of males. It was noted that the association between metal accumulation and gender could be ascribed to differences in metabolic activity between males and females. Typically, the sex that grew faster, often females, could be expected to have lower metal concentrations (Pourang et al.,2004; Yılmaz and Yılmaz, 2007; Olgunoglu et al., 2015). Hence, the average metal concentrations in males’ tissues were higher than those in the tissue of females (p>0.05). In a study to determine the accumulation of heavy metals in little tunny (Euthynnus alletteratus) fish, the levels of some heavy metals in muscle were significantly higher in males than in females Ansel and Benamar (2018). Thus, it appears that the results obtained were consistent with previous studies.

Additionally, to provide insight into the pollution at the location where the fish are caught, recorded heavy metal levels in muscle ranged from 0.158 to 0.454 µg/g for Cu, 3.297 to 9.731 µg/g for Zn, 1.025 to 5.044 µg/g for Fe, <0.1 to 0.182 µg/g for Mn, <0.250 to 0.287 µg/g for Al, <0.1 to 0.147 µg/g for Ni, and 0.024 to 1.109 µg/g for Hg, regardless of fish species and sexes. Cr, Cd, and Pb were not detected.

In the gonads, heavy metal levels were as follows: Cu ranged from 0.915 to 2.073 µg/g, Zn from 11.75 to 36.873 µg/g, Fe from 7.447 to 79.01 µg/g, Mn from 0.368 to 1.568 µg/g, Cr from <0.1 to 0.232 µg/g, Al from <0.250 to 2.248 µg/g, Ni from 0.105 to 0.289 µg/g, Hg from 0.034 to 1.398 µg/g, Cd from <0.01 to 0.087 µg/g, and Pb from <0.01 to 0.058 µg/g.

Distribution patterns of metal concentration in both fish muscle samples and gonads follow a sequence, irrespective of fish species and sexes.

For muscle: Zn (5.96)> Fe (2.12)> Cu (0.29)> Hg (0.25)> Ni (0.07)> Al (0.05) = Mn (0.05)

For gonads: Fe (31.50)> Zn (23.28)> Cu (1.40)> Al (0.83)> Mn (0.74)> Hg (0.45)> Ni (0.19)> Cr (0.06)> Cd (0.04)> Pb (0.02)

The graph of the ranking of heavy metal levels from highest to lowest is given in Figure 2.

Figure 2. The ranking of heavy metal levels from highest to lowest in fish.

Zn, as an essential element crucial for organisms’ normal growth and metabolic processes, demonstrated the highest accumulation in the tissue samples compared to other metals. Similarly, iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) are essential trace elements for animal metabolism. Studies have reported that Zn, Fe, and Cu are the most abundant elements in tissues, surpassing the levels of other metals (Pourang et al., 2005; Krishna et al., 2014). Our results are consistent with the findings reported for Zn, Cu, and Fe.

In Table 4, heavy metal concentrations in selected fish species caught from different fishing locations in the Aegean Sea were summarized, demonstrating the variability of metal levels in organisms and their reflection of contamination levels in the sampling areas for comparison.

Table 4. Concentrations of heavy metal in specific fish species in various fishing grounds in the Aegean Sea (µg g–1).

Metals Species Muscle Gonad Author
Zn Engraulis encrasicolus 20.03±0.11
39.44±2.18/41.60±8.41
Erdem et al., 2021 Tecimen et al., 2023
Sardinella aurita 26.06±6.05/32.30±1.42 Tecimen et al., 2023
Sphyraena sphyraena 13.09±1.19/21.15±3.01 Tecimen et al., 2023
Mugil cephalus 25.63±2.43/39.69±6.01 Tecimen et al., 2023
Mullus barbatus 5±0.8–15.5±1.06
26.63±4.89/41.38±2.67
39±5.3/117.2±9.6 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999 Tecimen et al., 2023
Merluccius merluccius 5.5±0.23/15± 2.05 38.5±5.3/182±12.6 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
Boops boops 4.5±1.03/30±4 32±4.5/118.4±14 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
Lithognathus mormyrus 5.01±0.15 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Diplodus vulgaris 4.95±0.16 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pagellus erythrinus 5.04±0.27
18.94±2.55/32.64±3.99
Yabanlı et al., 2016 Tecimen et al., 2023.
Sparus aurata 1.01±0.24 Döndü et al., 2023
Pomatomus saltatrix 5.26±1.55 Türkmen et al., 2009
Merlangius merlangus 12.8±2.02 Tepe et al., 2008
Fe Engraulis encrasicolus 13.6±0.01 Erdem et al., 2021
Sparus aurata 3.43±0.75 Döndü et al., 2023
Pomatomus saltatrix 11.6±2.78 Türkmen et al., 2009
Merlangius merlangus 21.9±3.26 Tepe et al., 2008
Al Engraulis encrasicolus 1.44±0.04 Erdem et al., 2021
Lithognathus mormyrus 0.41±0.11 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Diplodus vulgaris 0.45±0.13 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pagellus erythrinus 0.45±0.12 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Cu Engraulis encrasicolus 0.88±0.0
1.54±0.23/5.28±0.85
Erdem et al., 2021 Tecimen et al., 2023.
Merluccius merluccius 0.04-0.4±0.15 0.4±0.06/2.2±0.45 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
Sphyraena sphyraena 0.80±0.66/ 5.82±0.58 Tecimen et al., 2023
Sardinella aurita 1.26±0.22/3.16±0.53 Tecimen et al., 2023
Mugil cephalus 0.94±0.08/3.44±1.40 Tecimen et al., 2023
Mullus barbatus 0.13±0.04
0.03-0.35± 0.08
0.96±0.22/4.41±0.93
Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999 Tecimen et al., 2023
1.15±0.21/3.45± 0.71
Boops boops 0.05/0.85±0.13 0.22±0.05/2.55±0.15 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
Mullus surmuletus 0.18±0.05
0.17±0.05
Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Lithognathus mormyrus 0.17±0.05
0.17±0.05
Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pagellus erythrinus 0.22±0.14
0.21±0.03
0.97±0.15/3.03±1.54
Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015 Yabanlı et al., 2016 Tecimen et al., 2023.
Diplodus vulgaris 0.21±0.03
0.22±0.14
Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pomatomus saltatrix 0.68±0.10 Türkmen et al., 2009
Sparus aurata 1.31±2.30 Döndü et al., 2023
Merlangius merlangus 3.97±0.68 Tepe et al., 2008
Mn Engraulis encrasicolus 0.57±0.02 Erdem et al., 2021
Merlangius merlangus 1.03±0.25 Tepe et al., 2008
Pomatomus saltatrix 0.14±0.04 Türkmen et al., 2009
Sparus aurata 1.80±1.12 Döndü et al., 2023
Ni Engraulis encrasicolus 0.14±0.22 Erdem et al., 2021
Pomatomus saltatrix 0.80±0.18 Türkmen et al., 2009
Merlangius merlangus 0.58±0.13 Tepe et al., 2008
Cr Engraulis encrasicolus 0.03±0.00 Erdem et al., 2021
Mullus barbatus 0.28±0.07 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Mullus surmuletus 0.27±0.10 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Lithognathus mormyrus 0.38±0.11 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.38±0.11 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pagellus erythrinus 0.31±0.14 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.39±0.07 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Diplodus vulgaris 0.39±0.07 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.31±0.14 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pomatomus saltatrix 0.06±0.01 Türkmen et al., 2009
Merlangius merlangus 0.27±0.11 Tepe et al., 2008
Pb Thunnus alalunga 0.020-0.557 Stamatis et al., 2019
Engraulis encrasicolus 0.70±0.37 Tecimen et al., 2023.
Sardinella aurita 0.41±0.28/0.46±0.23 Tecimen et al., 2023
Sphyraena sphyraena 0.21±0.10/0.98±0.54 Tecimen et al., 2023
Mugil cephalus 0.28±0.10/1.30±0.49 Tecimen et al., 2023
0.10±0.02 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Mullus barbatus 0.07-0.85±0.14 0.55±0.16-0.80±0.22 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
0.21±0.10/ 0.78±0.19 Tecimen et al., 2023
Boops boops 0.55±0.09 /0.8±0.23 0.5±0.06/3.15±0.65 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
Mullus surmuletus 0.10±0.02 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Lithognathus mormyrus 0.10±0.02 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.11±0.03 Yabanlı et al., 2016
0.10±0.02 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Pagellus erythrinus 0.10±0.02 Yabanlı et al., 2016
0.20±0.15/ 0.92±0.15 Tecimen et al., 2023
Diplodus vulgaris 0.10±0.02 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.12±0.05 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Merlangius merlangus 1.00±0.16 Tepe et al., 2008
Pomatomus saltatrix 0.24±0.11 Türkmen et al., 2009
Cd Thunnus alalunga 0.021-0.669 Stamatis et al., 2019
Mullus barbatus 0.03±0.01 0.03-0.65±0.1 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.04/0.25±0.05 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
Merluccius merluccius 0.04/0.15±0.05 0.04±0.01/ 0.25±0.08 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
Boops boops 0.04/0.15±0.04 0.04/0.75±0.15 Zyadah and Chouikhi, 1999
Mullus surmuletus 0.03±0.01 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Lithognathus mormyrus 0.03±0.01 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.03±0.01 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pagellus erythrinus 0.03±0.01 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.03±0.01 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Diplodus vulgaris 0.03±0.01 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.03±0.01 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pomatomus saltatrix 0.01±0.00 Türkmen et al., 2009
Sparus aurata 0.01±0.01 Döndü et al., 2023
Merlangius merlangus 0.05±0.01 Tepe et al., 2008
Hg Mullus barbatus 0.10±0.03 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Mullus surmuletus 0.09±0.03 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
Lithognathus mormyrus 0.10±0.03 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.10±0.03 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Pagellus erythrinus 0.09±0.03 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.09±0.03 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Diplodus vulgaris 0.09±0.02 Yabanli and Alparslan, 2015
0.09±0.03 Yabanlı et al., 2016
Thunnus alalunga 0.141-0.938 Stamatis et., 2019
Sparus aurata 2.79±0.85 Döndü et al., 2023

The comparison of mean metal concentrations in muscle tissues and gonads (Table 4) reveals variations in muscle tissue metal levels among different organisms. Notably, some studies have reported significantly higher concentrations of heavy metals, including Zn, Fe, Cr, Al, Mn, Pb, and Cd, compared to the levels found in our study for all species. On the other hand, Ni concentrations were compatible with the previous studies on some fish species (Erdem et al., 2021). In the case of Hg, a higher concentration was noted in L. piscatorius. Additionally, it has been observed that the concentration of Cu, particularly in the muscles of B. belone, is partially higher when compared to the species listed in Table 4. Tecimen et al. (2023) reported higher levels of Zn, Cu, and Pb in the muscle tissue of S. sphyraena compared to those found in our study for the same species. This situation is thought to arise from the differences in sampling areas and pollution levels. When the accumulation of Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd in the gonads was compared with the values provided in Table 4, it was evident that the Zn, Cu, and Cd levels obtained in the study were mostly by previously reported values. However, the reported quantity of Pb appeared to be higher.

In summary, prior research has demonstrated that a multitude of factors, including species variations, seasonal changes, fish length and weight, diverse ecological requirements, metabolic processes, feeding patterns, water’s physical and chemical attributes, and pollution levels, can collectively impact the accumulation of metals in fish tissues.

Health risk assessment

The permissible limits determined in the present study for edible fish muscles intended for human consumption may vary depending on the region and regulatory authority. However, while there are no specific maximum acceptable values for all elements, they were lower than the limits, including Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, and Pb, set by national and international agencies (Table 5) such as FAO, WHO, and EC (Verep and Mutlu, 2022).

Table 5. Estimated weekly intake (EWI), compared with provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), target hazard quotient (THQ), and total THQ (∑THQ) of heavy metals in edible tissues of B. belone S. sphyraena, L. piscatorius.

Cu Zn Fe Mn Cr Al Ni Hg Cd Pb
PTWI 3500* 7000* 5600++ 2500** 700* 28.6 ++ 35 4+ 25+
PTWI(k) 2.45E5 4.90E5 3.92E5 175E3 4.9E3 2000 2450 280 1750
PTMI 25***
EWI Bb 0.6162 12.593 4.1924 0.5111 0.2244 0.0445
EWI Bb 0.8085 17.330 8.9833 0.2457 0.0427
EWI Ss 0.5503 5.8719 2.0125 0.1228
EWI Ss 0.4684 6.5932 3.4480 –– 0.1567
EWI Lp 0.2813 7.1222 1.8255 0.3241 1.9751
EWI Lp 0.3223 14.173 2.2155 0.1887 0.2618 0.3757
THQ Bb 2.20081E–03 5.99688E–03 8.55607E–04 7.30210E–05 1.60290E–03 6.36071E–02
THQ Bb 2.88776E–03 8.25281E–03 1.83334E–03 1.75556E–03 6.10629E–02
∑THQ Bb 7.43364E–02♀
7.57923E–02♂
THQ Ss 1.96546E–03 2.79617E–03 4,10720E–04 1.75556E–01
THQ Ss 1.67287E–03 3.13965E–03 7.03677E–04 2.23897E–01
∑THQ Ss 1.80728E–01♀
2.29413E–01♂
THQ Lp 1.00499E–03 3.39153E–03 3,72556E–04 3,30757E–04 2.82161E+00
THQ Lp 1.15129E–03 6.74914E–03 4.52156E–04 1.92639E–04 5.36844E–01
∑THQ Lp 2.82671E+00♀
5.47260E–01♂
PL1 <20 40 100 1.00 0.20–0.50

PTWI: Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake (µg kg–1 body weight); PTWI(k): Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake (µg kg–1 70 kg body weight) PTMI: Provisional Tolerable Monthly Intake (µg kg–1 body weight); EWI: Estimated Weekly Intake (µg kg–1 body weight); THQ: Target Hazard Quotient (Bb: B. belone; Ss: S. sphyraena, Lp: L. piscatorius); PL: Permissible limits (µg g–1) +: FAO/WHO, 2011; ++Çiftçi et al., 2021: *Mohamed et al., 2017: **Mohamed et al., 2019; ***EFSA, 2011; 1Verep and Mutlu, 2022; Kilercioglu et al., 2022; ♀: Female; ♂: Male

Sometimes, even though muscle tissue in marine species often has low metal concentrations, the risk it poses may vary depending on the quantity consumed (Kilercioglu et al., 2022). Therefore, EWI and THQ were calculated for each of the heavy metals in three female and male fish species to assess health risks associated with the common consumption of muscle tissue (Table 5). Also, Table 5 compares the estimated EWI to the recommended values, such as PTWI. The PTWI value calculates the quantity of a contaminant that humans can ingest throughout their lifetime without significant risk. PTWI standards are determined by the Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), a collaborative body of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the World Health Organization (WHO) for the United Nations. The quantity of food consumed influences the PTWI, the duration of consumption, and the level of contamination in the food (Alipour et al., 2015).

Therefore, in the current study, PTWI values were employed as reference standards (safe levels) for heavy metals to compare them with EWI levels, and all samples exhibited EWI values lower than the corresponding PTWI(k) values. In general, there is no health-threatening concern due to the consumption of edible muscle of these three fish species from the Aegean Sea.

THQ is recognized as an indicator used to evaluate potential health risks to consumers. A THQ or ∑THQ below 1 indicates no adverse hazard for the exposed population. When THQ or ∑THQ equals 1, it suggests that the affected individuals may face noncarcinogenic health risks, with the likelihood of these risks increasing as the THQ value rises (Miri et al., 2017; Kilercioglu et al., 2022). In the present study, the sum of THQ values for all the related heavy metals was higher only in the muscle of male L. piscatorius than in females and other species, exceeding 1. Moreover, except for Hg in the muscle of male L. piscatorius, THQ values for all other metals were below 1, indicating an absence of health hazards for the population who consume B.belone S. Sphyraena from the Aegean Sea. These variations in THQ values have been attributed to the fact that L. piscatorius is a demersal fish species and disparities in average weight and lifespan.

Conclusions

This study evaluated heavy metal accumulation in the muscle tissues and gonad-selected fish species (B. belone, S. sphyraena, , L. Piscatorius) from the Aegean Sea to assess health risk potential. Results showed different accumulation patterns among the genders and between the species. Generally, the mean metal concentrations in the muscle of male fish were higher than in female fish species. When comparing muscle and gonads, it has been determined that gonads, especially in females, tend to accumulate heavy metals at higher concentrations than muscles (p<0.05). In the case of the edible part of the fish, primarily the muscle tissue, THQ and ∑THQ values were calculated, and the results did not exceed 1.00, except for L. piscatorius. Based on the results obtained, the primary concern for human health among the examined metals is the level of Hg in female L. piscatorius (p<0.05). In light of the potential for the accumulation of toxic levels of this metal, it is recommended to continue monitoring heavy metal concentrations in the benthic fish, L. piscatorius, caught in the Aegean Sea, Türkiye. Additionally, the following suggestions should be considered.

  • Monitoring heavy metal levels in different seasons and regions as part of scientific research should be continuous

  • It is recommended to conduct and monitor heavy metal studies in other aquatic species in the region.

  • Studies on heavy metal monitoring should encompass water and sediment samples, as well as organisms in the Aegean Sea

  • Efforts to reduce pollution from industrial and agricultural activities should be supported

  • Caution should be exercised regarding the consumption of fish gonads due to potential heavy metal contamination

  • Efforts should be made to raise awareness about potential risks associated with fish consumption among the public, and specific recommendations should be provided, especially for at-risk groups

Conflict of Interest

The authors affirm that their work is unaffected by financial interests or personal relationships.

REFERENCES

Akoto, O., Bismark Eshun, F., Darko, G., and Adei, E. 2014. Concentrations and health risk assessments of heavy metals in fish from the Fosu Lagoon. Int. J. Environ. Res. 8(2):403–410.

Alipour, H., Pourkhabbaz, A., and Hassanpour, M. 2015. Estimation of potential health risks for some metallic elements by consumption of fish. Water Qual Expo Health. 7:179–185. 10.1007/s12403-014-0137-3

Ansel, M.A., and Benamar, N. 2018. Accumulation of heavy metals in muscle, liver, and gonads of little tunny (Euthynnus alletteratus) from the western region of Algeria. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25: 32640–32648. 10.1007/s11356-018-3254-x

Astani, Z.F., Jelodar, H.T., and Fazli, H. 2018. Studying the accumulation of heavy metals (Fe, Zn, Cu, and Cd) in the tissue (muscle, skin, gill, and gonad) and its relation with fish (Alosa braschinkowi) length and weight in Caspian Sea coasts. J. Aquac. Mar. Biol. 7(6): 308–312. 10.15406/jamb.2018.07.00226

Ateş, A., Türkmen, M., and Tepe, Y. 2015. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in fourteen marine fish species of four Turkish seas. Indian J. Geo-Marine Sci. 44(1): 49–55.

Ayas, Z., Ekmekci, G., Yerli, S.V., and Ozmen, M. 2007. Heavy metal accumulation in water, sediments, and fishes of Nallihan Bird Paradise, Turkey. J. Environ. Biol. 28(3): 545–549.

Bat, L., Öztekini, A., Arici, E., and Şahin, F. 2020. Health risk assessment: heavy metals in fish from the southern Black Sea. Foods Raw Mater. 8(1): 115–124. 10.21603/2308-4057-2020-1-115-124

Çiftçi, H., Çalışkan, Ç.E., and Öztürk, K. 2021. Determination of trace and toxic metal levels in some fish species and assessment of human health risk. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ. J. Adv. Res. Nat. Appl. Sci., 7(2): 219–233. 10.28979/jarnas.883611

Chen-Yi, C., and Chen, M.H. 2001. Heavy metal concentrations in nine species of fishes caught in coastal waters off Ann-Ping, S.W. Taiwan. J. Food Drug Anal. 9(2): 107.

Döndü, M., Özdemir, N., Demirak, A., Keskin, F., and Zeynalova, N. 2023. Bioaccumulation and human health risk assessment of some heavy metals in sediments, Sparus aurata, and Salicornia europaea in Güllük Lagoon, the south of Aegean Sea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30: 18227–18243. 10.1007/s11356-022-23463-1

Dural, M., Göksu, M.Z.L., and Özak, A.K. 2007. Investigation of heavy metal levels in economically important fish species captured from the Tuzla lagoon. Food Chem. 102:415.

Ebrahimi, M., and Taherianfard, M. 2010. Concentration of four heavy metals (cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic) in organs of two cyprinid fish (Cyprinus carpio and Capoeta sp.) from the Kor River (Iran). Environ. Monit. Assess. 168: 575–585. 10.1007/s10661-009-1135-y

EFSA. 2011. Statement on tolerable weekly intake for cadmium, EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy. EFSA J. 9(2).

El-Moselhy, K.H.M., Othman, A.I., and El-Azem, H.A. 2014. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in some tissues of fish in the Red Sea, Egypt. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 1(2): 97.

Erdem, M.E., Köstekli, B., Keskin, İ., Kocatepe, D., and Kaya, Y. 2021. Mineral Matter Content and Heavy Metal Contamination of Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus Linnaeus 1758) captured from different seas. KSU J. Agric. Nat. 24 (2): 285–292. 10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.741633

Farombi, E.O., Adelowo, O.A., and Ajimoko, Y.R. 2007. Biomarkers of oxidative stress and heavy metal levels as indicators of environmental pollution in African Cat Fish (Clarias gariepinus) from Nigeria Ogun River. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 4(2): 158.

FAO/WHO. 2011. Evaluations of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series.

Gu, Y.G., Lin, Q., Huang, H.H., Wang, L.G., Ning, J.J., and Du, F.Y. 2017. Heavy metals in fish tissues/stomach contents in four marine wild commercially valuable fish species from the western continental shelf of South China Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 114: 115–1129. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.040

Han, J.L., Pan, X.D., Chen, Q., and Huang, B.F. 2021. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in marine fish to the population in Zhejiang, China. Sci. Rep. 11: 11079. 10.1038/s41598-021-90665-x

Javed, M., and Usmani, N. 2016. Accumulation of heavy metals and human health risk assessment via the consumption of freshwater fish Mastacembelus armatus inhabiting thermal power plant effluent-loaded canal. SpringerPlus. 5: 776. 10.1186/s40064-016-2471-3

Khezri, P.H., Takhsha, M., Jamshid, K.A., and Haghshenas, A. 2014. Assessment level of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg) in four fish species of Persian Gulf (Bushehr-Iran). Int. J. Adv. Tech. Eng. Res. 4(2): 34.

Kilercioglu, S., Kosker, A.R., and Evliyaoglu, E. 2022. Public health risk assessments associated with heavy metal levels in panga fish fillets imported from Vietnam. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Food Sci. 6(4): 568–578. 10.31015/jaefs.2022.4.9

Krishna, P.V., Jyothirmayi,, and Rao, K.M. 2014. Human health risk assessment of heavy metal accumulation through fish consumption, from Machilipatnam Coast, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. Res. J. Public Environ. Health. 1(5): 121.

Külcü, A.M., Ayas, D., Köşker, A.R., and Yatkin, K. 2014. The Investigation of metal and mineral levels of some marine species from the Northeastern Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Biol. Oceanogr. 3(2). 10.4172/2324-8661.1000127

Makedonski, L., Peicheva, K., and Stancheva, M. 2015. Comparison of heavy metal concentration of some marine fishes from Black and Aegean Seas. Ovidius Univ. Ann. Chem. 26(1): 20–26. 10.1515/auoc-2015-0004

Miri, M., Akbari, E., Amrane, A., Jafari, S.J., Eslami, H., Hoseinzadeh, E. et al. 2017. Health risk assessment of heavy metal intake due to fish consumption in the Sistan region, Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 189. 10.1007/s10661-017-6286-7

Mohamed, H., Haris, P.I., and Brima, E. 2017. Estimated dietary intakes of toxic elements from four staple foods in Najran City, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14(12): 1575. 10.3390/ijerph14121575

Mohamed, H., Haris, P.I., and Brima, E. 2019. Estimated dietary intake of essential elements from four selected staple foods in Najran City, Saudi Arabia. BMC Chem., 13(1): 73. 10.1186/s13065-019-0588-5

NMKL. 1998. Nordic Committee on Food Analysis (NMKL) method No 161. Metals, determination by atomic absorbtion spectrophotometry after wet digestion in microwave oven. pp. 8.

Oguz, A.R., and Yeltekin, A. 2014. Metal levels in the liver, muscle, gill, intestine, and gonad of lake Van Fish (Chalcalburnus tarichi) with abnormal gonad. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 159(1–3): 219–223. 10.1007/s12011-014-9980-0

Olgunoglu, M.P. 2015. Heavy metal contents in muscle tissues of three deep-seawater Mediterranean shrimp species (Plesionika martia, Plesionika edwardsii, Aristeus antennatus). Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 24(6): 2553–2557.

Olgunoglu, M.P., Artar, E., and Olgunoglu, İ.A. 2015. Comparison of heavy metal levels in muscle and gills of four benthic fish species from the Northeastern Mediterranean Sea. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 24(4): 1743–1748.

Pokorska, N.K., Witczak, A., Protasowicki, M., and Cybulski, J. 2022. Estimation of target hazard quotients and potential health risks for toxic metals and other trace elements by consumption of female fish gonads and testicles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 19(5): 2762. 10.3390/ijerph19052762

Pourang, N., Dennis, J.H., and Ghourchian, H. 2004. Tissue distribution and redistribution of trace elements in shrimp species with the emphasis on the roles of metallothionein. Ecotoxicology. 13(6): 519.

Pourang, N., Dennis, J.H., and Ghourchian, H. 2005. Distribution of heavy metals in Penaeus semisulcatus from Persian Gulf and possible role of metallothionein in their redistribution during storage. Environ. Monit. Assess. 100(1–3): 71.

Sabbir, W., Rahman, M.Z., Halder, T., Khan, M.N., and Ray S. 2018. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in fish feed available in three districts of Southwestern region of Bangladesh. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 6(2): 100–104.

Sadeghi, P., Loghmani, M., and Frokhzad, S. 2020. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals via consumption of commercial marine fish (Thunnus albacares, Euthynnus affinis, and Katsuwonus pelamis) in Oman Sea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(14): 14944–14952. 10.1007/s11356-020-07907-0

Safahieh, A., Monikh, F.A., Ronagh, M.T., Savari, A., and Doraghi, A. 2011. Determination of heavy metals (Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, and Pb) in croaker fish (Johnius belangerii) from Musa estuary in the Persian Gulf. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2(6): 460.

Smith, C.A.E., Ackerman, J.T., Willacker, J.J., Tate M.T., Lutz M.A., Fleck, J.A., Stewart, A.R. et al. 2016. Spatial and temporal patterns of mercury concentrations in freshwater fish across the Western United States and Canada. Science of the Total Environment 568: 1171–1184. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.229

Stamatis, N., Kamidis, N., Pigada, P., Stergiou, D., and Kallianiotis, A. 2019. Bioaccumulation levels and potential health risks of mercury, cadmium, and lead in albacore (Thunnus alalunga, Bonnaterre, 1788) from The Aegean Sea, Greece. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 16: 821. 10.3390/ijerph16050821

Storelli, M.M., and Marcotrigiano, G.O. 2000. Fish for human consumption: risk of contamination by mercury Food Additives and Contaminants, 17(12): 1007–1011.

Tecimen, L.C., Çiftçi, N., and Cicik, B. 2023. Heavy Metal levels and human health risk assessment in some fish species caught from Kuşadası Bay (Aegean Sea). Adv. Underw. Sci. 3(1): 1–08.

Tepe, Y., Türkmen, M., and Türkmen, A. 2008. Assessment of heavy metals in two commercial fish species of four Turkish seas. Environ. Monit. Assess. 146(1–3): 277–284. 10.1007/s10661-007-0079-3

Terra, B.F., Araújo, F.G., Calza, C.F., Lopes, R.T., and Teixeira, T.P. 2008. Heavy metal in tissues of three fish species from different trophic levels in a tropical Brazilian River. Water Air Soil Pollut. 187(1–4): 275–284. 10.1007/s11270-007-9515-9

Turkmen, A., Tepe, Y., Turkmen, M., and Mutlu, E. 2009. Heavy Metal contaminants in tissues of the Garfish, Belone belone L., 1761, and the Bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix L., 1766, from Turkey Waters. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 82(1): 70–74. 10.1007/s00128-008-9553-z

Usman, I.B., and Mustapha, A.B. 2017. Bacteriological quality and heavy metal concentration of smoked catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in minna niger state, Nigeria. Dutse J. Pure Appl. Sci. (DUJOPAS), 3(2):149–160.

Uysal, K., Emre, Y., and Köse, E. 2008. The determination of heavy metal accumulation ratios in muscle, skin, and gills of some migratory fish species by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) in Beymelek Lagoon (Antalya/Turkey). Microchem. J. 90:67.

Verep, B., and Mutlu, T. 2022. Heavy metal concentrations and health risk assessment in Sarda sarda (Bloch, 1793) caught in the Turkish Black Sea coasts. Acta Aquat. Turcica, 18(2): 208–216. 10.22392/actaquatr.1012944

Wong, C.K., Wong, P.P.K., and Chu, L.M. 2001. Heavy metal concentrations in marine fishes collected from fish culture sites in Hong Kong. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 40: 60–69. 10.1007/s002440010148

Yalçin, H., and Çakmak, T. 2023. Heavy metal quantity and health risk assessments in frozen shrimp samples. Kocatepe Vet. J. 16(3): 277–286.

Yabanlı, M., and Alparslan, Y. 2015. Potential health hazard assessment in terms of some heavy metals determined in demersal fishes caught in eastern. Aegean Sea. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 95: 494–498. 10.1007/s00128-015-1584-7

Yabanlı, M., Alparslan, Y., Hasanhocaoglu, H.Y., Yapıcı, S., and Yozukmaz, A. 2016. Determination of heavy metal content in commercial marine fish hunted from Southeast Aegean Sea (Turkey) and their potential risk for public health. Caspian J. Environ. Sci., 14(1): 1–13.

Yılmaz, F., Özdemir, N., Demirak, A., and Tuna, A.L., 2007. Heavy metal levels in two fish species Leuciscus cephalus and Lepomis gibbosu. Food Chem. 100: 830.

Yilmaz, A.B. 2003. Levels of heavy metals (Fe, Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb, and Zn) in tissue of Mugil cephalus and Trachurus mediterraneus from Iskenderun Bay, Turkey. Environ. Res. 92: 277–281.

Yilmaz, A.B., and Yilmaz, L. 2007. Influences of sex and seasons on levels of heavy metals in tissues of green tiger shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1844). Food Chem., 101: 1664.

Zyadah, M., and Chouikhi, A. 1999. Heavy metal accumulation in Mullus barbatus, Merluccius merluccius, and Boops boops fish from the Aegean Sea, Turkey. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., 50(6): 429–434. 10.1080/096374899100996