PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINT: STILL A PROPER METHOD TO START IMPROVING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE ENTERPRISES

Main Article Content

M. MORESI
A. CIMINI

Keywords

beer, carbon footprint, dry pasta, environmental impact, GHG emissions

Abstract

Given the complexity of food production,  supply chains and distribution, this paper sustains that the mere assessment of the product carbon footprint might still be regarded as a first trial in the field of improving the sustainability of the food and drink industry. After having reviewed the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with the agro-food system in industrialized countries, and summarized the main direct environmental impacts of the food industry, the pros and cons of the Life Cycle assessment (LCA) methodology were briefly examined together with the current standard methods used toassess the environmental impact of food and drink products. Once a cradle-to-grave product carbon footprint modelling had been developed,  some mitigating actions might be tested with the final goal of reducing the  GHG emissions associated with the most impacting product life cycle stages.  As an example, such a procedure was applied to approximately halve the cradle-to-grave carbon footprint of two cereal-based products (i.e., dry pasta and malt beer). A cost/benefit analysis is required to relate the marginal increase in the product processing costs to each reduction in the product environmental load.

Abstract 1296 | pdf Downloads 744

References

ACEA. 2013. “Joint press info: Environmental footprint methodology: Not for us: State consumers and manufactures”. Retrieved from www.acea.be/press-releases/article/joint_press_info_environmental_footprint_methodology_not_for_us_state_consu (May 4, 2019).

ADEME. 2010. “Bilan Carbone® appliqué au bâtiment. Guide-Methodologique”. Retrieved from www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/bilan-carbone-applique-batiment-guide-methodologique-7152.pdf (May4, 2019).

ANEC (European Association for the Co-ordination of Consumer Representation in Standardisation). 2012. “ANEC position: Environmental assessment goes astray –A critique of environmental footprint methodology and its ingredients”. ANEC-ENV-2012-G-008final, 22 May 2012. Retrieved from www.anec.eu/images/documents/position-papers/2012/ANEC-ENV-2012-G-008final-3.pdf (May 4, 2019).

Anonymous. n.d. “Current World Population”. Retrieved from www.worldometers.info/world-population/ (May 3, 2019).

Assobirra, 2018.“Annual Report 2017”. Assobirra, Rome, Italy. Retrieved from www.assobirra.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/AnnualReport_2017_2.pdf (May 4, 2018).

BDI (Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V.). 2015. “Position paper. Design Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) in a reasonable and consistent way!” Dokumenten Nr. D 0689. Retrieved from https://bdi.eu/media/themenfelder/umwelt/downloads/umweltinformationen-produkte-und-dienstleistungen/Positionspapier_PEF_engl..pdf (May 4, 2019).

Berners-Lee M. 2010. “How bad are bananas? The carbon footprint of everything”, p. 197. Profile Books Ltd, London, UK,.

Bhatia P., Cummis C., Brown A., Draucker L., Rich D., and Lahd H. 2011. “Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard”. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from www.ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/ghgp/standards/Product-Life-Cycle-Accounting-Reporting-Standard_041613.pdf (May 4, 2019).

BMUB/UBA/TUB. 2014. “Position paper on EU Product and Organisation Environmental Footprint proposal as part of the communication building the single market for green products” (COM/2013/0196 Final). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetailDoc&id=25855&no=2 (May 4, 2019).

BSI. 2008. “Publicly Available Specification (PAS 2050) for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emission of goods and services”. British Standards Institution, London.

Carlsson-Kanyama A. 1998. Climate change and dietary choices -how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? Food Policy 23: 277.

Church N. 2005. “Why our food is so dependent on oil?” Retrieved from http://321energy.com/editorials/church/church040205.html (May 4, 2019).

Cibelli M., Cimini A., Marconi E., and Moresi M. 2017. Carbon Footprint della pasta di semola di grano duro. In Proc.s of the 11th Conv. AISTEC “I cereali perun sistema agroalimentare di qualità”, p. 148. AISTEC, Rome, November 22-24, 2017.

Cimini A., and Moresi M. 2016. Carbon Footprint of a pale lager packed in different formats: assessment and sensitivity analysis based on transparent data. J. Clean. Prod. 112:4196.

Cimini A., and Moresi M. 2018a. Are the present standard methods effectively useful to mitigate the environmental impact of the 99% EU food and drink enterprises? Trends Food Sci. Tech. 77:42.

Cimini A., and Moresi M. 2018b. Mitigation measures to minimize the cradle-to-grave beer carbon footprint as related to the brewery size and primary packaging materials. J. Food Eng. 236:1.

Cimini A., and Moresi M. 2018c. Effect of brewery size on the main process parameters and cradle-to-grave carbon footprint of lager beer. J. Ind. Ecol. 22(5):1139.

Cimini A., Cibelli M., and Moresi M. 2019a. Reducing the cooking water-to-dried pasta ratio and environmental impact of pasta cooking. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99:1258.

Cimini A., Cibelli M., Messia M.C., Marconi E. and Moresi M. 2019b. Cooking quality of commercial spaghetti: effect of the water-to-dried pasta ratio. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 245:1037.

Cimini A., Cibelli M. and Moresi M. 2019c. Cradle?to?grave carbon footprint of dried organic pasta: Assessment and potential mitigation measures. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99:5303.

de Larminat P. 2016. Earth climate identification vs. anthropic global warming attribution. Annu. Rev. Control 42:114.

Dieu T.T.M. 2009. Food processing and food waste. Ch. 2. In “Sustainability in the Food Industry”. C.J. Baldwin (Ed.), p. 23. Institute of Food Technologists Series, Vol. 35. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, IA.

Dreicer M., Tort V., and Manen P. 1995. “Extern E, Externalities of Energy”. Vol. 5. Nuclear, Centre d'étude sur l'Evaluation de la Protection dans le domaine nucléaire (CEPN). European Commission DGXII, Science, Research and development JOULE, Luxembourg.

EC. 2012. Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide. Consolidated version No. N 070307/2009/552517. European Commission Joint Research Centre. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy.

EEA (European Environment Agency). 2017. Trends in atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4 and N2O”. Retrieved from www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/atmospheric-concentration-of-carbon-dioxide-4#tab-chart_5_filters=%7B%22rowFilters%22%3A%7B%7D%3B%22columnFilters%22%3A%7B%22pre_config_polutant%22%3A%5B%22CH4%20(ppb)%22%5D%7D%7 (May 4, 2019).

El Bilali H. 2018. Relation between innovation and sustainability in the agro-food system. Ital. J. Food Sci. 30(2):200.

European Commission. 2011. “Sustainable food consumption and production in a resource-constrained world -The 3rd SCAR Foresight Exercise Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union”. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/fw_lib_feg3-report-web-version_en.pdf(May 1, 2019).

FAO. 2018. “Building climate resilience for food security and nutrition”. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, I. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/I9553EN/i9553en.pdf (May 1, 2019).

Finkbeiner M. 014. Product environmental footprint -Breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 19: 266. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0678-x

FoodDrinkEurope. 2012. “Environmental sustainability vision towards 2030”. Food Drink Europe, Brussels, B. www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/priorities/detail/environmental-sustainability/ (May 1, 2019).

FoodDrinkEurope. 2017. “Product environmental footprinting. Experience and recommendations of the food and drinksector”. Retrieved from www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/uploads/publications_documents/FoodDrinkEurope_Product_Environmental_Footprinting.pdf (May 4, 2018).

FoodDrinkEurope. 2018. “Data & trends European food and drink industry 2018”. FoodDrinkEurope, Brussels, B. Retrieved from www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/uploads/publications_documents/FoodDrinkEurope_Data_and_Trends_2018_FINAL.pdf (May 1, 2019).

FoodDrinkEurope. 2019. “Sustainable Development Goals”. Retrieved from https://sdg.fooddrinkeurope.eu/ (May 1, 2019).

Frischknecht R., Steiner R., and Jungbluth N. 2008. “The ecological scarcity method –Eco-factors 2006. A method for impact assessment in LCA”. Environmental studies no. 0906. Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), Bern.

Huijbregts M.A.J., Rombouts L.J.A., Hellweg S., Frischknecht R., Hendriks A.J., van de Meent D., Ragas Ad. M.J., Reijnders L., and Struijs J. 2006. “Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products?” Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (3): 641.

Humbert S., Marshall J. D., Shaked S., Spadaro J.V., Nishioka Y., Preiss P., McKone T. E., Horvath A., and Jolliet O. 2011. Intake fraction for particulate matter: Recommendations for life cycle impact assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(11):4808.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 1996. “The science of climate change”, p. 18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

IPCC. 2007. “IPCC Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007”. Retrieve from www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/syr/ (April 19, 2019).

IPCC. 2013. “Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.

ISO. 2006a. “Environmental Management -Life Cycle Assessment -Principles and Framework” (ISO 14040:2006). International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneve, CH.

ISO. 2006b. “Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment -Requirements and guidelines” (ISO 14044:2006). International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneve, CH.

ISO. 2006c. “Environmental labels and declarations -Type III environmental declarations -Principles and procedures” (ISO 14025:2006). International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneve, CH.

ISO/TS. 2013. “Greenhouse gases-Carbon footprint of products -Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication” (ISO/TS 14067:2013). International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneve, CH.

ISPRA. 2018. “Italian greenhouse gas inventory 1990-2016: National Inventory Report 2018”. Rapporto no. 283. ISPRA, Rome, Italy. Retrieved from hwww.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/rapporti/italian-greenhouse-gas-inventory-1990-2016.-national-inventory-report-2018 (April 19, 2019).

Lehmann A., Bach V., and Finkbeiner M. 2016. EU product environmental footprint -midterm review of the pilot phase. Sustainability 8, 92: 1. (DOI: doi.org/10.3390/su8010092)

Manfredi S., Allacker K., Chomkhamsri K., Pelletier N., and Maia de Souza D. 2012. “Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide”. Consolidated Version. Ref. Ares (2012) 873782 -17/07/2012. European Commission, Ispra, I.

Milà i Canals L., Romanyà J., and Cowell S.J. 2007. Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). J. Clean. Prod. 15:1426.

Minkov N., Finkbeiner M., Sfez S., Dewulf J., Manent A., Rother E., Weyell P., Kralisch D., Schowanel D., Lapkin A., Jones M., and Azapagic A. 2016. “Background Document. Supplementing the Roadmap for Sustainability Assessment in European Process Industries. Current State of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)”. Version 1.0 Retrieved from http://spire2030.eu/sites/default/files/project/measure/uploads/Modules/Mediaroom/measure-roadmap-bd-current-state-in-lcsa.pdf (April 19, 2019).

MISE (Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico). n.d. “Bilancio Energetico Nazionale 2016”. Retrieved from https://dgsaie.mise.gov.it/ben.php (May 4, 2019).

Morawicki R.O. 2012. “Handbook of Sustainability for the Food Sciences”. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.

Moresi M. 2014. Assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the food industry. Agro Food Ind. Hi Tec. 25(3): 53.

Moresi M., and Valentini R. 2010. Food choices adhering to the Mediterranean diet to limit the environmental impact of the Italian agro-food sector. Ind. Aliment.-Italy 49 (May), 9.

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). n.d. “Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide”. Retrieved from https://dgsaie.mise.gov.it/ben.php (April 19, 2019).

Notarnicola B., Sala S., Anton Ac , McLaren S. J., Saouter E., Sonesson U. 2017. The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 140:399.

Rosenbaum R.K., Bachmann T.M., Gold L.S., Huijbregts M.A.J., Jolliet O., Juraske R., Köhler A., Larsen H.F., MacLeod M., Margni M., McKone T.E., Payet J., Schuhmacher M., van de Meent D., and Hauschild M.Z. 2008. USEtox -The UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in Life Cycle Impact Assessment.Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 13(7):532.

SeppäläJ., Posch M., Johansson M., and Hettelingh J.P. 2006. Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator.Int. J. Life Cycle Ass.11(6):403.

Sonesson U., Davis J., Flysjö A., Gustavsson J., and Witthöft C. 2017. Protein quality as functional unit -A methodological framework for inclusion in life cycle assessment of food. J. Clean. Prod. 140:470.

Struijs J., Beusen A., van Jaarsveld, H., and Huijbregts M.A.J. 2009. Aquatic eutrophication. Ch. 6. In “ReCiPe 2008 -A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Report I: Characterisation factors”, 1st edn. M. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M.A.J. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Struijs, R. van Zelm (Ed.), p. 59. Ministerie van VROM, Den Haag, NL. Retrieved from www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/publications/recipe_characterisation.pdf (May 8, 2019).

Tukker A., Huppes G., Guinée J., Heijungs R.,de Koning A., van Oers L., Suh S., Geerken T., Van Holderbeke M., Jansen B., and Nielsen P. 2006. “Environmental impact of products. (EIPRO). Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25”. Technical report EUR 22284 EN. European Communities Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/eipro_report.pdf (April 19, 2019).

UN (United Nations). 2015. “Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development”. Retrieved from www.un.org/pga/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/08/120815_outcome-document-of-Summit-for-adoption-of-the-post-2015-development-agenda.pdf (May 1, 2019).

UNAFPA. 2015. “Statistics -Pasta consumption”. Retrieved from www.pasta-unafpa.org/ingstatistics4.htm (May 4, 2019).

UNCC (United Nations Climate Change). 2018. “National inventory submissions 2018”. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-convention/greenhouse-gas-inventories-annex-i-parties/submissions/national-inventory-submissions-2018 (May 4, 2019).

van Oers L., de Koning A., Guinee J.B., and Huppes G. 2002. “Abiotic resource depletion in LCA”. Road and Hydraulic Engineering Institute, Ministry of Transport and Water, Amsterdam, NL.

van Zelm R., Huijbregts M.A.J., Den Hollander H.A., Van Jaarsveld H.A., Sauter F.J., Struijs J., Van Wijnen H.J., and Van de Meent D. 2008. European characterisation factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment. Atmos. Environ. 42:441.

Vermeulen S.J., Cambell B.M., Ingram I.S. 2012. Climate change and food systems. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour. 37:195.

WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 1999. “Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1998”. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project -Report No. 44. WMO, Geneva, CH.

Worldometers. 2019. “Italy Population(Live)”. Retrieved from www.worldometers.info/world-population/italy-population/ (May 4, 2019).

WRI (World Resources Institute). 2013. “Creating a Sustainable Food Future. A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people by 2050”. World Resources Report 2013-14: Interim Findings. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.